Annoyed 9/11 Rant
Apparently some people haven’t read my “About” page, because if they had, they’d realize that I’M NOT INTERESTED in 9/11 conspiracy theory CRAP! Maybe I’ll annoy a few readers that subscribe to the “the U.S. Government is responsible for 9/11″ belief, but so be it. I’m not here to please the world, just trying to toss out survival bones. Everyone has the right to believe what they want, but I have a right not to listen.
What’s this rant about? It’s mostly in reference to someone that used the SHTFblog MySpace page to post a video on all of this drummed up junk on how the U.S. Government has serious questions to answer about 9/11. Don’t go checking for it - I deleted it. Like writing a daily post and moderating comments to thin out the trolls that call me profanities isn’t enough to do, I now have to moderate comments on MySpace.
Someone spent a significant amount of time creating elaborate videos about all of these past U.S. covert maneuvers, events and correspondance to build a case that Bush, Inc. is responsible for sending planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a remote field, all for justification to go to war with Afghanistan and Iraq. The videos are 100% one-sided (as you can probably imagine) and, if viewed solely on what’s presented, might make someone start to wonder. They highlight a few particular government letters, some flight paths of F-16’s, some military plans, etc. What the video FAILS to tell you is that there are only about 14 BILLION different government correspondence documents that flutter around D.C. each and every day. You could sift through them, highlight a few sentences from select pieces, and build a case for virtually anything you want. It’s kind of like some politician saying he/she doesn’t recall ever meeting some controversial figure, only to have the press publish a photo of them standing next to that controversial figure 3 years ago. Hello! These people get their pictures taken with 16,000 people - a week! Not literally, but head out during campaign season, attend some fundraiser dinner for $200, toss in another $300 and, after the dinner, you can be one of many that gets their picture taken with them. Five-hundred bucks. That’s nothing to many, many people.
I have my own opinions on the skills and smarts of George Bush and Dick Cheney, but I don’t for a minute believe they’re responsible for the deaths of 3,000+ American citizens. Do I think the U.S. Government is perfect? No, but it could be a hell of a lot worse. I’m into survivalism, because I believe in self-responsibility and independence. Most people have virtually no understanding of how DEPENDENT they are on others for their own well-being. Most people have no clue how fragile that dependence is. But I don’t do 9/11 conspiracy theories.
. . . . . . . George Bush is an alien from Mars, though . . . . that I might buy . . . . . . .
***************
WMD Strike - We’re Not Ready
Okay, somewhat related to 9/11, but with a different slant - the United States is still not ready. Did anyone catch the latest report from the “Commission on National Guard”? Congress charged them with performing the study and it was released yesterday. The reasons they cited we’re not ready: troop, equipment and training shortages. Check it:
The commission’s 400-page report concludes that the nation “does not have sufficient trained, ready forces available” to respond to a chemical, biological or nuclear weapons incident,” an appalling gap that places the nation and its citizens at greater risk.”
“Right now we don’t have the forces we need, we don’t have them trained, we don’t have the equipment,” commission Chairman Arnold Punaro said in an interview with The Associated Press. “Even though there is a lot going on in this area, we need to do a lot more. … There’s a lot of things in the pipeline, but in the world we live in — you’re either ready or you’re not.”
Their top recommendation:
The panel said the Defense Department must use the nation’s citizen soldiers to create an operational force that would be fully trained, equipped and ready to defend the nation, respond to crises and supplement the active duty troops in combat.
Pointing to the continued strain on the military, as it fights wars on two fronts, the panel said the U.S. has “no reasonable alternative” other than to continue to rely heavily on the reserves to supplement the active duty forces both at home and abroad.
Check the entire article here or read the full report here. This, of course, underscores what we already know. The government won’t be there to help you during a time of crisis. Prepare now. If you need SHTF shit (gas masks and such), hit U.S. Cavalry, tell ‘em Ranger Man sent ya!
Remember, entering code CJ10 at checkout gets you 10% off any order of $99.00 or more (until it expires).
woo-hoo!
- Ranger Man
BTW: Rebel, I haven’t forgotten your top 10 handguns TEOTWAWKI post request. Patience, my SHTF homie. Such thoughts take deliberation.



7 responses so far ↓
1 Rushman // Feb 1, 2008 at 9:18 am
Hey buddy you forgot about the Chem-trails coming out of the jets and don forget about who controls the money…..LOL. Seriously though it is good to see a real man’s (or woman’s, best to be PC) survialist on the net. Most have the tinfoil wrapped a bit to tight and the legend thinks most of us have a undisclosed huge income. Thanks for keeping it real and funny sometimes. Later from a Central center midwestern state somewhere in the union (Missouri),
Rushman
2 Rebel // Feb 1, 2008 at 10:45 am
Rangerman,
thanks for keeping this blog’s info and entertainment level high, and whacko contribution low. I especially liked the dumster diving LOL.
3 ryan // Feb 1, 2008 at 3:22 pm
I agree that some of the super conspiracy theorists irritate me. There is some definite overlap between them and survivalists. A top 10 TEOTWAWKI handguns post would be cool. I will then get to say my opinions without needing to do all sorts of research which is prett cool. As always I will give credit where it is due. Keep up the good work.
4 Jennersen // Feb 1, 2008 at 4:54 pm
Oh come on Rangerman, we all know the movie “They Live” is a documentary! LOL
Citizen soldiers are the guard . . . I never liked that one especially when they are constantly sent where the Federal and not the State says to go. Then again I do understand that we the citizens are not experts on hazmat materials, which would mean that an expert group would be required in such a nasty event.
Now the question is do I carry a gasmask everywhere?
Mars . . . No, no, no, no they are from Galaxy M185b.
5 ryan // Feb 1, 2008 at 4:59 pm
I sadly agree about the readiness of the National Guard and Army Reserve. There are a lot of people who only exist on the UMR (unit manning roster). I think the readiness of Active Component units should also be looked into also. They are better in terms of UMR vs. reality but equipment and training are still issues due to back to back deployments and gear wear down.
6 KC // Feb 1, 2008 at 8:11 pm
Ranger Man,
At the risk of having this deleted and being called a ‘whack-a-mole’ I will state the following statement I’ve used when people ask why any government isn’t ready to deal with any and all comers: “The Federal Government’s number one priority is the continuity of the Federal Government and has tailored itself to that goal. The Federal Government is by design, not there to provide for its citizens, it is there to exist and survive.”
As for the state of readiness of the Reserve Components of the Department of Defense, would anyone who pays taxes want the expense involved with the establishment and continual maintenance of a organization that would reliably protect and when that fails execute re-constitution efforts on behalf of those citizens who were the unfortunate victims of such a event? As a taxpayer, I most certainly would not! As a caveat to this as a taxpayer, wouldn’t it be better to either modify or remove such laws that interfere with personal/family/ community preparedness, specifically those laws which limit what kind and numbers of certain equipment that private citizens can possess? Most certainly is my reply.
KC
7 Ranger Man // Feb 1, 2008 at 8:28 pm
KC, I wouldn’t categorize that as “whack-a-mole”. I’ve only ever deleted four comments and they were all riddled with profanity, all directed at me.
I’m all for people disagreeing with me. I don’t know it all. The comments I deleted contributed nothing towards group education. They were just trolls telling me where to go.
Thanks for the comment.
Leave a Comment