Weaponized Nanotechnology is a Huge Threat to Humanity

1_cambridgeIn a recent Cambridge University conference, researchers revealed there is a 5 percent chance nanoweapons will cause human extinction prior to the year 2100. The prospect of weaponized nanotechnology is fairly new so elaboration is needed. Weaponized nanobots are smaller than a pinhead and can be programmed to perform a variety of lethal functions. These include: injecting toxins, targeted killings, and poisoning water supplies. One of the more disturbing implications of weaponized nanotechnology is the advent of mini-nukes. These nuclear bombs would weigh, at most, five pounds and would be easily concealable in a pocket or purse. Louis Del Monte, a physicist and nanoweapons researcher, believes it is likely terrorists will acquire some forms of weaponized nanotechnology in the late 2020s.

While the prospect of miniature nuclear weapons is frightening, the most dangerous aspect of nanotechnology is the ability of nanobots to self-replicate. If self replicating nanobots were released, they would become autonomous and would kill indiscriminately. In this manner, nanobots would become something like a man-made, robotic virus.

Check Out: Quick Buyer’s Guide to Imported AK Market¬†

1_russia_chinaDespite reservations about the development of nanotechnology, Russia, China, and the United States are currently investing billions into the development of nanoweapons. The atomic bomb was the revolutionary weapon that defined the 20th Century. It seems as though nanoweapons will be the defining weapon of the 21st Century.

Interested in learning more? Check out Louis Del Monte’s book “Nanoweapons: A Growing Threat to Humanity“. Does the development of nanoweapons concern you? How should the US confront Russian and Chinese development of nanoweapons? Sound off in the comments.

Visit Sponsors of SurvivalCache.com

300-x-250-hope-for-the-best

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

the_survivalist_podcast

 

 

 

 

 

Save

Save

Save

Save

4 comments… add one
  • Pineslayer March 21, 2017, 7:44 pm

    I believe that nanotech can come from anywhere, and it doesn’t need to be a conventional bomb. More than likely it will get out of control very quickly, think crop destruction or…

    http://survivalcache.com/book-review-directive-51-john-barnes-a-novel-of-daybreak/

    Is there a way to stop it? Nanotech vs. nanotech. Maybe a base on the Moon doesn’t seem so crazy.

    Reply
  • Roger March 21, 2017, 9:57 pm

    Don’t worry, the space aliens and zombies are going to get us first! GLAHP!

    Reply
  • Dc April 21, 2017, 3:57 am

    Everytime they try to stop something, in secret with the evil as soros and others will buy into it any way shape or form!

    Heck, Hillary Clinton sold Putin our Nuclear material while secretary of state! And hid it by using a Canadian company to do the transaction!

    THE EVIL OF MANUFACTURING HATE FROM THE BEGINING OF TRUMPS CAMPAIGN AND REPEATING FALSELY DAILY ON ALL THE MEDIA PER SOROS, OBAMAS DAILY DIRECTION, INCITING VIOLENCE! Is JUST AS BAD!

    Trump was awardedvthe Ellis Island Award for help black inner city kids! I THANK EVERY DAY FOR TRUMP. THE MANUFACTURED HATE CRIME MUST STOP!

    Reply
  • jackson July 7, 2017, 10:40 am

    @Dc: no, she actually (and factually) didn’t but Reagan, on the other hand, financed Bin Laden, H.W. Bush had some sketchy ties to Osama as well. and “W” helped finance the Taliban months before 9/11. get yer factoids straight, d00d.

    Reply

Leave a Comment